 |
 |

The Effect of Early Diagnosis and Treatment in Cystic FibrosisA Seven-Year Study of 16 Sibling Pairs
David M. Orenstein, MD;
Thomas F. Boat, MD;
Robert C. Stern, MD;
Arthur S. Tucker, MD;
Edward L. Charnock, MD;
LeRoy W. Matthews, MD;
Carl F. Doershuk, MD
Am J Dis Child. 1977;131(9):973-975.
Abstract
Data on 16 sibling pairs with cystic fibrosis were analyzed to test the hypothesis that early treatment of this condition improves prognosis. Younger siblings' conditions were diagnosed before 1 year of age, usually before the onset of pulmonary disease. Older siblings' conditions were diagnosed after 1 year of age and after the onset of pulmonary disease. Although the sibling pairs received similar treatment, comparison at 7 years of age showed that the younger siblings had significantly better chest roentgenogram scores, total clinical scores, residual lung volumes, and ratios of residual volume to total lung volume. Younger siblings also required fewer hospital admissions to control their lung disease. The results suggest that, in general, early initiation of therapy is beneficial for patients with cystic fibrosis.
(Am J Dis Child 131:973-975, 1977)
Author Affiliations
From the Department of Pediatrics, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland.
Footnotes
Reprint requests to Rainbow Babies and Childrens Hospital, 2103 Adelbert Rd, Cleveland, OH 44106 (Dr Doershuk)
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
Epidemiology and Survival Analysis of Cystic Fibrosis in an Area of Intense Neonatal Screening Over 30 Years
Assael et al.
Am J Epidemiol 2002;156:397-401.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Newborn Screening for Cystic Fibrosis in Wisconsin: Comparison of Biochemical and Molecular Methods
Gregg et al.
Pediatrics 1997;99:819-824.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Early Treatment of Cystic Fibrosis
Orenstein
JAMA 1982;248:2113-2113.
ABSTRACT
Cystic Fibrosis Mistaken for Gastroesophageal Reflux-Reply
FRATES and Cox
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1982;136:279-279.
ABSTRACT
|