You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 130 No. 10, October 1976 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Serologic Response to Revaccination With Two Rubella Vaccines

A. David Brandling-Bennett, MD; Robert S. Jackson, MD; Scott B. Halstead, MD; Carlos C. Campbell, MD; Kenneth L Herrmann, MD; John F. Modlin, MD; Joel D. Meyers, MD; John J. Witte, MD

Am J Dis Child. 1976;130(10):1081-1084.


Abstract

• Three years after receiving rubella vaccine, 1,060 elementary school children living on the island of Maui, Hawaii, were revaccinated with either HPV-77 DE-5 or RA 27/3 rubella vaccine given subcutaneously or intranasally in order to compare the effectiveness of these two vaccines in raising antibody titers. RA 27/3 was the more effective booster vaccine, producing fourfold or greater titer rises in 20.1% of recipients, including 80% of children with hemagglutinationinhibiting antibody titers ≤ 1:40 at the time of revaccination. Intranasal revaccination was not significantly more effective than subcutaneous revaccination, although it did elicit higher titers in children who responded. Responses differed according to the vaccine that children had received three years earlier. Because antibody titers have persisted in vaccinated children, routine administration of a second dose of rubella vaccine is not currently recommended.

(Am J Dis Child 130:1081-1084, 1976)



Author Affiliations

From the Center for Disease Control (Drs Brandling-Bennett, Jackson, Campbell, Herrmann, Modlin, Meyers, and Witte), Public Health Service, US Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Atlanta, and the Department of Tropical Medicine and Medical Microbiology (Dr Halstead), University of Hawaii School of Medicine, Honolulu.


Footnotes

Reprint requests to Immunization Division, Center for Disease Control, 1600 Clifton Rd, Atlanta, GA 30333 (Dr Modlin).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Day-to-Day Reactogenicity and the Healthy Vaccinee Effect of Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccination
Virtanen et al.
Pediatrics 2000;106:62e-62.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RA27/3 Rubella Vaccine: A Four-Year Follow-up
Balfour et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1980;134:350-353.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1976 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.